PLUNDERWATCH
Plunder Watch
to "Witness History, Expose Histrionics" as Erap Trial
Starts Monday
September 30, 2001
THE INDEPENDENT
watchdog group Plunder Watch promised to "closely monitor
each development" as the Sandiganbayan starts the trial of
ousted President Estrada and his co-accused in the crime of plunder
on October 1.
"We will
be there to witness this historic moment and whatever histrionics
may be done unleashed by the defense," said Plunder Watch
convenor Dr. Carolina Pagaduan-Araullo as she bared that the group's
convenors would be on hand as the anti-graft court hears the charges
filed against Estrada, a first in the country's history.
"Tomorrow
will mark the much-delayed key step towards the achievment of
justice after People Power 2," Araullo said.
Araullo expressed
confidence that "there is a body of evidence strong enough
to pin down Estrada. We just have to ensure the prosecution does
its job and thwarts all possible underhanded tactics by the defense
such as what we have been witness to from the likes of Saguisag,
Flaminiano, Cuevas, Fortun and company."
Citing the
Supreme Court's ban on the trial's live media broadcast, Araullo
said that Plunder Watch would take advantage of all available
for common people and urged the public to join them in attending
the Sandiganbayan' hearings on the Estrada case.
However, Araullo
maintained that Plunder Watch has not given up on the issue of
live media coverage, adding that the group will endorse a second
motion for consideration that may be filed by the Department of
Justice and the Office of the Ombudsman.
As the trial
starts on Monday, Araullo chided the defense panel for "using
all sorts of tricks in a vain attempt to hatch an escape for Estrada."
"It seems
that Estrada's promise to face his accusers and answer all accusations
in a trial was all hogwash. The patience of the Sandiganbayan
and the public has limits with regards to all their dilatory tactics
and over 45 motions," said Araullo.
She added
that Plunder Watch will likewise launch a separate monitor at
the Supreme Court where Estrada's defense lawyers filed a motion
questioning the consitutionality of the Plunder Law, the same
law Estrada signed and accused of violating.
|